Condition: Naive vs Guided — both conditions, scored identically
Figures shown: mean accuracy, run-to-run std dev and illegibility rate across 10 runs at each model's base temperature, naive and guided side by side

Page generated: 2026-08-16
Data (model runs) generated: 2026-04-11
Scoring inputs: ground truth cc2ed8f5, evaluate.py 845b70e9

Evaluation Report — Base Temperature: Naive vs Guided

Why “tbase” and not “t0”: this is each model at its own established base temperature, which is t0 for four models but t1 for Claude (thinking) — extended thinking requires temperature 1, so that model has no t0 runs at all. Calling the page t0 was wrong for one of the five columns. Resolved per model: Claude t0, GPT t0, Gemini 2.5 t0, Gemini 3.1 t0, Claude (thinking) t1. 10 runs per model per condition.

Colour: naive cells use the blue ramp and guided cells the green ramp, consistent with the other comparison pages; the shade tracks the value in that cell. Δ = guided − naive.

1. Overall Accuracy by Model

ModelNaiveGuidedΔ
Claude56.6%55.4%-1.2%
GPT47.7%51.0%+3.2%
Gemini 2.564.5%68.3%+3.8%
Gemini 3.170.6%71.7%+1.2%
Claude (thinking)63.5%66.8%+3.3%

2. Per-Question Accuracy

Mean accuracy pooled over all pages and runs. Higher is better, so a positive Δ is an improvement.

Q#DescriptionClaudeGPTGemini 2.5Gemini 3.1Claude (thinking)
NaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔ
Feature identification
Q1 BoolHas date?92.3%100.0%+7.7%77.4%97.7%+20.3%97.4%97.4%±0.0%100.0%100.0%±0.0%97.2%100.0%+2.8%
Q3 BoolTwo columns?92.3%92.2%±0.0%97.2%97.4%+0.3%92.8%97.9%+5.1%95.6%100.0%+4.4%94.1%99.2%+5.1%
Q4 BoolSigned?97.4%92.7%-4.7%92.8%100.0%+7.2%83.1%97.4%+14.3%100.0%100.0%±0.0%95.1%100.0%+4.9%
Q6 BoolTop-left mark?74.4%77.7%+3.4%80.3%83.8%+3.6%90.0%91.0%+1.0%87.2%84.1%-3.1%70.3%79.0%+8.7%
Q21 BoolBracket annotation?97.1%97.1%±0.0%81.2%77.1%-4.1%89.9%89.9%±0.0%94.4%95.5%+1.1%96.6%97.7%+1.1%
Spatial location
Q5 StrSignature location97.4%92.7%-4.7%92.8%100.0%+7.2%84.4%100.0%+15.6%100.0%100.0%±0.0%95.1%100.0%+4.9%
Counting
Q7 IntArchivist marks55.1%67.6%+12.5%46.7%52.3%+5.6%51.5%71.6%+20.0%62.6%72.3%+9.7%56.4%65.4%+9.0%
Q8 IntQuondam count48.7%49.5%+0.8%24.9%25.9%+1.0%44.6%46.8%+2.2%67.2%65.9%-1.3%58.5%60.3%+1.8%
Q9 IntCon count47.4%45.3%-2.1%23.1%22.6%-0.5%64.4%71.8%+7.5%69.5%69.0%-0.5%69.7%71.5%+1.8%
Q11 IntE conjunction count22.6%24.4%+1.8%28.5%32.6%+4.1%17.7%32.0%+14.3%45.4%47.2%+1.8%39.2%45.6%+6.4%
Q13 IntNamed travelers13.6%4.7%-8.9%10.0%15.4%+5.4%40.5%37.2%-3.3%20.0%31.3%+11.3%44.9%50.3%+5.4%
Q14 IntUnnamed travelers35.4%35.2%±0.0%15.6%16.2%+0.5%48.2%53.7%+5.5%47.9%53.1%+5.1%47.2%50.8%+3.6%
Q15 IntPlaces of origin30.3%37.6%+7.3%2.6%5.9%+3.3%33.6%33.3%-0.3%34.4%22.1%-12.3%31.0%34.4%+3.3%
Q16 IntUnique places of stay37.9%18.4%-19.6%29.7%32.1%+2.3%45.4%51.7%+6.3%52.6%50.0%-2.6%47.7%49.0%+1.3%
Q18 IntStay w/ person name42.8%33.2%-9.7%12.8%18.2%+5.4%81.3%86.6%+5.3%62.6%67.4%+4.9%60.0%46.2%-13.8%
Q19 IntBracket total32.3%26.2%-6.1%59.5%60.8%+1.3%53.3%40.3%-13.0%72.8%77.4%+4.6%39.5%50.0%+10.5%
Transcription
Q10 TextWords after con86.0%81.4%-4.6%60.9%62.6%+1.6%92.2%92.0%±0.0%91.5%91.0%-0.5%88.8%88.0%-0.8%
Q12 TextWords after e58.6%54.7%-3.9%41.1%44.3%+3.2%51.8%55.3%+3.5%68.7%70.4%+1.8%62.5%62.3%±0.0%
Q22 TextAnnotation text83.2%85.7%+2.5%63.4%60.0%-3.4%80.4%83.8%+3.4%90.8%90.1%-0.7%83.6%84.5%+0.9%
Counting + Spatial location
Q17 PairStay per column31.0%31.6%+0.6%22.3%15.4%-6.9%60.3%64.1%+3.8%50.0%47.2%-2.8%34.4%40.3%+5.9%
Q20 PairBrackets per column25.6%23.8%-1.8%52.1%47.7%-4.4%51.0%39.5%-11.5%72.8%77.4%+4.6%35.6%42.8%+7.2%
Transcription + Rule-based resolution
Q2 IntYear?45.2%50.4%+5.2%39.1%59.1%+20.0%67.9%71.9%+4.1%67.5%67.9%+0.4%48.1%50.7%+2.7%

3. Consistency Across Runs (Std Dev)

Standard deviation of per-run mean accuracy across the 10 runs — how much the model's score wobbles from run to run. Lower is better, so the Δ colouring is inverted here: a fall in std dev is an improvement and renders green. Shade saturates at 0.07.

Q#DescriptionClaudeGPTGemini 2.5Gemini 3.1Claude (thinking)
NaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔ
Feature identification
Q1 BoolHas date?2.1%0.0%-2.1%1.1%0.8%-0.3%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%1.5%0.0%-1.5%
Q3 BoolTwo columns?0.0%0.2%+0.2%1.5%0.0%-1.5%1.1%1.1%±0.0%1.2%0.0%-1.2%1.2%1.2%±0.0%
Q4 BoolSigned?0.0%1.0%+1.0%1.6%0.0%-1.6%2.2%0.0%-2.1%0.0%0.0%±0.0%1.5%0.0%-1.5%
Q6 BoolTop-left mark?0.0%1.5%+1.5%4.4%3.2%-1.2%1.9%1.3%-0.6%0.0%1.1%+1.1%2.5%5.0%+2.5%
Q21 BoolBracket annotation?0.0%0.1%±0.0%3.2%2.8%-0.3%1.9%1.1%-0.8%0.0%1.4%+1.4%1.1%1.2%±0.0%
Spatial location
Q5 StrSignature location0.0%1.0%+1.0%1.6%0.0%-1.6%1.9%0.0%-1.9%0.0%0.0%±0.0%1.5%0.0%-1.5%
Counting
Q7 IntArchivist marks2.2%1.8%-0.4%4.0%5.7%+1.7%4.3%2.2%-2.1%1.8%3.4%+1.6%3.6%3.0%-0.6%
Q8 IntQuondam count1.7%2.7%+1.0%1.7%0.8%-0.9%4.4%4.2%±0.0%2.0%4.0%+2.0%6.6%3.7%-2.9%
Q9 IntCon count3.0%1.6%-1.4%4.5%3.4%-1.1%3.5%3.0%-0.6%1.5%4.3%+2.8%2.4%4.3%+1.9%
Q11 IntE conjunction count3.6%3.1%-0.5%3.1%3.0%±0.0%4.9%3.0%-1.9%3.0%3.0%±0.0%5.5%5.1%-0.4%
Q13 IntNamed travelers3.6%2.7%-1.0%1.5%5.8%+4.3%3.8%3.7%±0.0%2.0%3.2%+1.1%6.1%7.8%+1.7%
Q14 IntUnnamed travelers4.8%2.8%-2.0%3.9%4.5%+0.6%6.8%3.5%-3.3%1.2%6.7%+5.5%7.2%4.7%-2.5%
Q15 IntPlaces of origin3.2%4.6%+1.5%2.4%3.0%+0.6%5.0%5.9%+0.9%3.7%4.4%+0.7%2.8%5.2%+2.3%
Q16 IntUnique places of stay4.0%3.3%-0.7%5.7%5.7%±0.0%3.6%3.6%±0.0%2.5%5.4%+2.9%5.4%6.8%+1.3%
Q18 IntStay w/ person name5.7%3.5%-2.1%2.1%6.4%+4.4%2.7%3.9%+1.2%1.8%4.7%+2.9%3.5%3.4%±0.0%
Q19 IntBracket total3.0%3.9%+0.9%3.2%7.6%+4.4%3.2%5.0%+1.9%3.2%4.0%+0.7%5.7%6.4%+0.7%
Transcription
Q10 TextWords after con0.7%0.4%-0.3%1.6%2.4%+0.8%0.9%0.5%-0.4%0.5%0.8%+0.4%1.1%0.7%-0.4%
Q12 TextWords after e2.1%2.2%±0.0%2.3%2.6%+0.3%2.9%2.2%-0.6%1.3%2.5%+1.3%2.6%2.8%+0.3%
Q22 TextAnnotation text0.9%0.6%-0.3%2.7%1.3%-1.5%1.9%1.1%-0.8%1.0%2.4%+1.4%1.6%1.6%±0.0%
Counting + Spatial location
Q17 PairStay per column2.8%3.0%±0.0%5.0%3.8%-1.2%4.7%4.9%±0.0%2.8%3.2%+0.5%4.6%6.9%+2.4%
Q20 PairBrackets per column2.1%3.3%+1.2%2.7%4.9%+2.1%2.8%5.7%+2.9%3.2%4.0%+0.7%5.7%4.5%-1.2%
Transcription + Rule-based resolution
Q2 IntYear?1.2%1.2%±0.0%2.0%1.6%-0.4%0.0%1.1%+1.1%1.1%0.0%-1.1%1.9%1.5%-0.4%

4. Illegibility Claim Rates (Boolean Questions)

Share of answers where the model claimed the page was illegible rather than answering. Boolean questions only. Lower is better, so the Δ colouring is inverted.

Q#DescriptionClaudeGPTGemini 2.5Gemini 3.1Claude (thinking)
NaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔNaiveGuidedΔ
Feature identification
Q1 BoolHas date?0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%
Q3 BoolTwo columns?0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%
Q4 BoolSigned?0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%1.3%2.6%+1.3%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%
Q6 BoolTop-left mark?0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%
Q21 BoolBracket annotation?0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%0.0%0.0%±0.0%