Condition: Naive vs Guided — both conditions, scored identically
Figures shown: mean signed error (model − ground truth) per page, averaged over 10 runs, naive vs guided

Page generated: 2026-08-16
Data (model runs) generated: 2026-04-11
Scoring inputs: ground truth cc2ed8f5, evaluate.py 845b70e9

Counting Question Error: Naive vs Guided

For each counting question, each model shows the mean signed error (model response − GT) per page across 10 runs. Zero line = ground truth. Bars to the right = over-count; bars to the left = under-count. Naive   Guided   Both at 50% transparency so overlaps are visible. Page IDs run top to bottom; models read left to right. Hover for details.

Q7: Archivist marks

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q8: Quondam count

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q9: Con count

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q11: E conjunction count

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q13: Named travelers

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q14: Unnamed travelers

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q15: Places of origin

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q16: Unique places of stay

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q18: Stay w/ person name

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)

Q19: Bracket total

Claude

GPT

Gemini 2.5

Gemini 3.1

Claude (thinking)